America’s Doctor — It’s not just that he’s so boring: Celia Farber comments on Anthony Fauci.

Originally posted Nov. 16, 2021

It was understood, without overt commands, that the “gay cancer” that had everybody in such a panic could not be assessed as complex toxic illness with a complex cause. The entire US media understood what to say and not say, and not only because of the allegiance to the shadow government, but because the era of classical science had ended. It ended that day. It would henceforth be a crime against decency to, for example, address anything that could be making gay men sick other than “the virus.”

Photo by Patrick Semansky. / Pool Photo.

By CELIA FARBER

People understand the Hannah Arendt concept of the “banality of evil.” I need to make a very important point here about Anthony Fauci, “America’s doctor.”

That girl who wrote for SPIN — my friend and sister, Celia Farber.

You have set yourself the formidable task of deconstructing him. Why is he “evil?” (Which he is.)

It’s not because he is so “banal,” so bureaucratic, so boring. That’s the drag costume.

In fact, he is a revolutionary — a very dangerous one, who slipped behind the gates when nobody understood what he was bringing in.

What was he bringing in? He was bringing in — as a trained Jesuit, and committed Globalist — a new potion that would achieve any and all aims for Pharma and the powers he served. The potion was then known as Political Correctness — now called “woke.”

Fauci switched the entire linguistic system of American science, from “classical speak,” to “woke speak.” He brought in Cancel Culture, essentially, before anybody could imagine what it was. It was too perverse for genuine scientists to conceive of such a thing mixing with science, they could not believe it, or grasp it. Like a rape. It was incredibly confusing. That’s what I documented, on the ground, that horror and confusion among real scientists, as American science is dying. This begins in the late 1980s, after 1987.”

That’s what I documented, on the ground, that horror and confusion among real scientists, as American science is dying. This begins in the late 1980s, after 1987.”

Let me elaborate a bit. Fauci’s reign begins in 1984, a year of total change. Everything changes, all of a sudden. Gallo is deployed with Margaret Heckler to make the declaration by US government fiat that the “probable cause of AIDS” had been “found” and that it was some kind of trans-Atlantic fusion that looked “virus like” on the big screen, but was really neither a cogent virus nor a pathogen. The reason it “flew” to use Harvey Bialy’s word, was because everything had already changed.

It was understood, without overt commands, that the “gay cancer” that had everybody in such a panic could not be assessed as complex toxic illness with a complex cause. The entire US media understood what to say and not say, and not only because of the allegiance to the shadow government, but because the era of classical science had ended. It ended that day. It would henceforth be a crime against decency to, for example, address anything that could be making gay men sick other than “the virus.”

Shrine to Saint Tony in the Planet Waves business office.

That’s not “bad science.” That’s perfectly executed political correctness. And they are diametrically at odds, in the Biblical sense of good and evil.”

What Fauci did was he made political correctness the new currency, of his funding empire.

Peter Duesberg was not ‘wrong’ about HIV and AIDS, he was politically incorrect about it and that was how Fauci banished him — sentenced him to funding and reputation death, as though he had done something really bad by dissenting against HIV theory.

Stop and think how insane this is. An elite cancer virologist brought over from Germany’s Max Planck Institute whose credentials are so outstanding, who was well on his way to solving cancer’s genetics…felled suddenly by a fatwah, issued by this…little…Mufti?

Who was he to issue a fatwah against America’s top cancer virologist? Well, he did. He blocked every federal research dollar to Duesberg after 1987, because Duesberg repudiated the woke ideology Fauci’s HIV empire, in a few paragraphs of a scientific paper that was about something else. He sustained the economic and reputational attack/vendetta for the next 3 decades. Without blinking. It’s really an unbelievable story. It would make Americans blood boil if they knew about it — because almost all have lost somebody in their family to cancer.

Fauci had, by 1987, when Duesberg wrote the Cancer Research paper that sealed his scientific fate, an apparatus that included mass media, psychological operations, public health–this octopus that just straight-up throttled the entire scientific tradition of Western civilization. Evidence based science and the discourse culture that goes with it — gone. That’s what he did. It’s no small feat. He destroyed American science by snuffing out its spirit, the spirit of open inquiry, proof and standards.

The reason so many outstanding scientists lent their names to opposing Fauci’s vendetta on Duesberg was not that they cared, necessarily, about the cause of AIDS; This was, for them, a battle over the very soul of science. Kary Mullis broke down crying in an interview I did with him in 1994, talking about it–talking about what Fauci did to Peter Duesberg and what it meant.

Who was he to issue a fatwah against America’s top cancer virologist? Well, he did. He blocked every federal research dollar to Duesberg after 1987, because Duesberg repudiated the woke ideology Fauci’s HIV empire, in a few paragraphs of a scientific paper that was about something else.

The real scientists were horrified. Suddenly a guillotine was present. A new and strange terror. People were “guilty,” of thought-crimes like “HIV denialism.” Fauci had made political correctness the new revolutionary language, see? And that meant if you were “bad,” if you didn’t push agenda driven science, everything was taken away from you. And the media cheered. And anybody who didn’t was destroyed, vilified, harassed, fired, in a word, canceled.

Prof. Peter Duesberg (shown in 2012) in his lab in Donner Hall. Known most for his research on HIV/AIDS, he is really a cancer genetics specialist. To hurt Peter is to hurt grandma.

What Hannah Arendt wrote about Eichmann, rings true also of Fauci:

“What he said was always the same, expressed in the same words. The longer one listened to him, the more obvious it became that his inability to speak was closely connected with an inability to think, namely, to think from the standpoint of somebody else. No communication was possible with him, not because he lied but because he was surrounded by the most reliable of all safeguards against the words and the presence of others, and hence against reality as such.”

You won’t find one sentence uttered by Anthony Fauci that resonates with real meaning. It’s empty contagion rhetoric, that never changes. It hits people in the part of their hearing and perceiving where they have stopped expecting to understand what the man is saying. That’s Mr. Global. Catherine Austin Fitts’ archetype–“Mr. Global.” That’s Fauci. A canvas onto which “goodness” is projected precisely because he repudiates language and delivers pure domination instead. A ruthless careerist who stands for nothing and whose speech is designed to manipulate people, to hypnotize them — make them respond to some kind of buzzing sound but not to living words, evolving ideas.”

The only idea Fauci has is that he’s never wrong.

And you see this in the Fauci followers, the Fauci-Davidians. That is their simple religion: Fauci is never wrong. Including and especially every time he is. Which is all the time, since he has no interest in truth or reality as it pertains to human illness or human wellness. He was wrong about so many things, starting with HIV, AIDS, the AZT genocide — he just makes mass death appear… virtuous, I don’t know how else to say it. He coins phrases like “lessons learned” when he wipes out a few hundred thousand gay men, as he did with high dose AZT. And they loved him for it.

Anthony Fauci, left, and Darth Vader. Photo by Eric Francis.

We all focused on Gallo, as the Darth Vader of AIDS, the Dark Father of it all, while Fauci was in fact, infinitely more powerful, and more dangerous. Gallo only did the deed of concocting “the virus” under conditions of fraud. He made the bomb.

Fauci ran the whole vendetta economy, and was able to very deftly use this new language of political correctness, to sort of…make himself this weird saint. But of what? Of failure? His whole career is failure. Now, for the globalists, that’s success. If a ‘virus’ is stopped, that’s no good. It has to always be worshipped and the flames fanned. That’s what he does. It’s occult stuff. Idolatry.

He is also the Saint of Fear. Why Americans should be afraid, all the time, of “viral threats,” and why they should never do anything to bolster their immune systems, they should only submit to drugs and vaccines and watch him on TV. Notice he never says anything is going to be alright. Never. He loves and abuses words like “risk,” “spread,” “worse,” — he loves all the tension words, never the resolving words.

He’s Mr. Maybe. Maybe this, maybe that. Cover all bases, spread the chips. As long as fear and anxiety are always peddled, and Americans remain weakened.

In the final analysis, he’s profoundly anti-American. He wants to destroy America, one American at a time. And he’s doing precisely that. No foreign enemy could ever, ever have caused this much destruction to our country and our people. I think Americans are beginning to see this is true now. But it’s a very painful thing to open your eyes to, so many simply won’t be able to.

2 Comments

  1. VIA RETHINKING AIDS DISCUSSION LIST

    From: John Lauritsen
    Sent: Wed, Nov 17, 2021 5:23 pm
    Subject: Re: [RA Board] Something is happening here but you don’t know what it is…

    I have problems with the following quotation from Celia’s longer quotation, which was printed in RFK, Jr.’s Fauci book:

    “It was understood, without overt commands, that the “gay cancer” that had everybody in such a panic could not be assessed as complex toxic illness with a complex cause. The entire US media understood what to say and not say, and not only because of the allegiance to the shadow government, but because the era of classical science had ended. It ended that day. It would henceforth be a crime against decency to, for example, address anything that could be making gay men sick other than “the virus.”

    “Gay cancer” refers to Kaposi’s sarcoma, which was once falsely believed to be a form of cancer. I believe that now, and for a long time, the only tenable hypothesis for the occurrence of one kind of KS among gay men was their use of “poppers” (volatile, alkyl nitrites).

    https://paganpressbooks.com/jpl/NIDA-KS.HTM

    I do not consider “AIDS” to be “[a] complex toxic illness with a complex cause. Rather, I consider “AIDS” to be a phony construct. For a long time my thinking has been:

    “AIDS” is not a coherent disease entity, but a phony construct. In reality, people with “AIDS” diagnoses are sick in different ways and for different reasons. Depending on their specific “AIDS-indicator disease[s]”, there are specific and appropriate measures they should take to recover.

    I go into considerable detail on there points in three key chapters in my 1993 book, *The AIDS War* (TAW): “The Risk- AIDS Hypothesis”, “Recovery From ‘AIDS'”, and “The Incidence Quagmire”. *TAW* is still in print and almost sold out of its 4th printing.

    Sorry to quibble. I do agree with almost of Celia’s quotation, but I think the existence of “AIDS” is even more basic than the existence of “HIV”.

    John Lauritsen

  2. […] Celia and I go back over the past 38 years of virus history, starting with the infamous press conference in 1984 at the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)— the one where HIV was declared to be the one and only cause of AIDS. Celia has covered Anthony Fauci since the beginning of his career at the NIH and contributed to Robert F. Kennedy’s book about him (read her essay). […]

Leave a Reply